‘It has taken countless hours of prayer,
study, conversation and emotional turmoil to bring me to the place where I am
finally ready to call for the full acceptance of Christian gay couples into the
Church.’ The words, last week, of a prominent American Christian Tony Campolo
signalling his change of heart and mind. A similar announcement followed from a
second high-profile US evangelical David Neff, former editor of Christianity Today.
In Scotland, at last month’s General
Assembly, the Kirk somewhat incongruously both affirmed its traditional teaching
on the issue, and voted to permit churches which are so disposed to call to
their pulpits ministers in same-sex partnerships.
To which onlookers might say ‘Why the
delay? What’s the problem? As a society we accept gay partnerships and affirm the
love shown between gay partners. What’s the problem with these Christians?’
At the heart of the issue is the fact
that Christians – all Christians – see God as the highest authority on how to
live our lives. God’s directives have a higher call on us than social customs
and ideas of what is ‘normal’, a higher call on us even than the law where the
two are in conflict.
And all Christians believe that the
Bible is ‘God-given’ although understandings of the mechanism by which it was
‘given’ vary.
Christians who oppose gay relationships
– upholders of tradition, but including many young Christians – read the
Bible’s comments in opposition to homosexual practice, and conclude in all
sincerity that gay partnerships are in breach of God’s will for us. Christianity Today last week reminded
its readers that 2bn Christians around the world take this line.
Many of these Christians are fine
people, compassionate people – they argue that because God opposes gay
relationships it is compassionate to warn people against them. And there are
many fine, courageous gay people who remain celibate from a sense of loyalty to
God, and God’s will as they see it.
But that is only one view. Others, who
regard the Bible as the sole authority in matters of faith, study the
vocabulary of the anti-homosexuality passages and their cultural context and
conclude that they are not referring to gay relationships as we see them today.
Other Christians still believe God also speaks
through history and through our prayerful reflection, bringing us back with new
eyes to our foundation document, the Bible. They recognise that most gay people
do not choose to be gay, and that the same Bible-affirmed qualities of love,
support and mutual encouragement are seen in gay as in straight partnerships. They
observe the spirituality and God-focussed joy and commitment in Christian gays
and conclude that these are not people from whom God has withdrawn the divine
smile.
As a young man, I didn’t question the
tradition. But by the 1990s, I had a growing sense of compassion for gay people.
Christians would say ‘It’s OK to be gay if that’s the way you are. But the
practice is wrong.’ But how, I wondered, could you separate physical expression
of your sexuality from what at heart you knew yourself to be?
I’m familiar with many of the debates
about what the texts do or do not say, the deep traditions and theologies. But
for me love lies at the core of Christian faith, and in the very heart of God
and I was powerfully drawn to affirm gay people and committed gay
relationships.
It is good when Christians have the
courage to stand up for what we believe is right even when it costs us dearly.
Society is strengthened by strong Christian voices. But some Christians,
supporting gay relationships, find that the hardest, most courageous thing is
to express that viewpoint within their own churches. It can be as difficult as
it is for a gay person to ‘come out’ to their families.
I urge my fellow Christians who take the
more traditional view to reflect deeply on the issue; to read the views of
those who think differently; to explore the testimonies of gay people who know
themselves to be blessed by God; to feel the pain of gay people rejected by
churches; to pray for wisdom.
The Church of Scotland has opted for a
‘mixed economy’ in which churches can hold different views.
Sometimes the language of the debate
among Christians is hard, judgemental, disrespectful. Those who stand in a different tradition are at
times depicted as being ‘outside’, ‘apostate’, facing God’s wrath.
Sisters and brothers, let us not use
such language, for we are all one in Christ Jesus. We have different views on
many issues, but we have found that there is room for us all beneath the
shelter of God’s love. We are God’s glorious, ragbag, mixed-economy church,
loved and blessed every last one of us.
(Christian Viewpoint column from the Highland News dated 18 June 2015)
No comments:
Post a Comment