I have a hunch that one of the ways
churches are changing is in becoming more open to members holding a range of
different views.
One Inverness church hosts group
sessions for discussion of controversial issues such as the relationship between
science and the Bible’s creation stories, attitudes to folk who are gay and
Christian perspectives on crime and punishment. It seems to me that diversity
of opinion is expected, even encouraged.
Flashback to early June 1980. I’ve
finished my final day working as a Bookshop Manager with Scripture Union in
Glasgow, and I’ve made my last use of staff discount to buy a huge pile of
books. I struggle out, laden with two bags packed with theology.
I thought, in my youthful naivety that
theology, at least in the evangelical tradition was all wrapped up and
finalised. I figured that in my hands I carried all the theology I would ever
need.
I was dimly aware of other theologies
besides the evangelical, but regarded them as deeply suspect. When someone
heard a sermon, the question was often asked ‘Was he sound?’ (it was always a
‘he’ of course) meaning ‘did he not deviate from evangelical truth?’ I’m sure
similar attitudes towards evangelicals were held in churches of a more liberal
persuasion.
The keepers of truth in the churches I
knew were elders and ministers, and
respected writers and speakers – fine men such as Martyn Lloyd-Jones, John
Stott, Jim Packer and the American Billy Graham (men who in fact had themselves
differed over some pretty fundamental issues.)
Over the years, I grew increasingly
uncomfortable because I sensed, rightly or wrongly, that conformity in belief
was expected – indeed that conformity in belief was one of the things church
was about – but found it increasingly difficult to conscientiously conform.
There are still, no doubt, some churches
where conformity of this sort is expected, but I keep hearing of others, new
and old, which are much more relaxed about diversity of belief.
The other Sunday I heard someone in
church outline a deeply-felt and well-argued case against the Assisted Suicide
Bill, currently before the Scottish Parliament. He said ‘I know some people
will disagree with me, and I respect that.’
‘I respect that.’ I like it! Perhaps
there were churches like that when I was young, churches where you were given
permission to disagree, to argue a case based on your understanding of the
Bible and Christian tradition, and the convictions of your own heart. But not
many.
And so I rejoice in today’s openness to
diversity. I have learned that theology is not a science, not a clinical
analysis of biblical data. A personal theology is a living thing, growing as a
result of encounter with God in the context of living. I love the poet
Christian Wiman’s comment that ‘if you believe at 50 what you believed at
fifteen, then you have not lived – or have denied the reality of your life.’
And all theology is a living, growing
thing as over the centuries the Church encounters God in the context of
history.
Asking a friend about diversity of belief
in his Inverness house church, I said ‘What holds your church together?’ ‘The
fact that Jesus Christ is Lord,’ he replied.
And this, it seems to me, is what lies
at the centre of any church, a conviction that Jesus Christ is Lord (different
people will understand this in different ways) - and not just a conviction, but
an encounter, be it ever so fragile, with the living Jesus, so that his love
flows through us.
For all his intellectual gifts, St Paul
did not say ‘I know what I have believed’ (though of course he did know this)
but ‘I know whom I have believed.’
It is engagement with Jesus, resulting
in love, which builds the church, not conformity to certain beliefs. And I
believe Jesus was will say to us not ‘How right were your beliefs as you
struggled to understand what ultimately lies beyond understanding,’ but ‘How
well did you love, how graciously did you express your views, how merciful were
you?’ and the most searching question ‘Did you love me? For whoever loves and
follows me is my true child.’
Many of us at some point in our lives,
and some of us throughout our lives feel comfortable in accepting the beliefs
we have drawn from our parents or learned from others, and that’s fine, but for
the many of us who struggle and question we need a church which performs the
function which A.S.J Tessimond describes in his poem Not love perhaps. He highlights ‘a need for inns on roads, islands
in seas. Halts for discoveries to be shared. Maps checked, notes compared.’
Blessed are they who find such churches.
(Christian Viewpoint column from the Highland News dated 3rd April 2014)
No comments:
Post a Comment